This is the final draft of litigation that will be filed in Court in the coming days. ROBBINS readers get an opportunity to view it ahead of time.

This Guantanamo Bay comes to Canada--reflects what I believe is a concerted effort by two levels of government, both the federal (Canada) and provincial (B.C.) to ruin me by any means necessary---but mostly--the egrigious, mean-spirited--'evil' efforts by Revenue Canada. We present this for a number of reasons, not the least of which to convey to readers what kind of dispicable planning and conspiracy can 'easily' be put in play by government to avoid being accountable to citizens. I am not the only one this has happened to--but I have the influence and the record to ensure that hundreds of thousands of citizens both in this country, the United States and all over the world---can realize the how deprived and unaccountable government can be--when it chooses to. You have legal rights in Canada only if you have money--(or if you are a criminal--where the government will finance your case for you--sometimes hundreds of cases---keeping that legal money flowing--and the exotic car dealerships ringing up sales throughout Vancouver).

The purpose of this should be obvious. I am someone who doesn't like being cheated---by crazy people in and out of government. It's time we turned the microscope of accountability back on the people in government, elected officials, bureaucrats, the courts--and each of them--beginning with this--trust me its going to be very exciting.

I am a patriotic person. My family goes back across Canada since before we were a country. I am not part of some special interest group--one of many in this country--that has co-opted government institutions for their own personal aggrandizement--the soft lilly pad which provides Canada will its pretense that it has the citizens rights first and foremost in mind.

Canada's citizens are truly great--most of them--our governments, courts, and institutions have become dangerous.

I hope this effort will help.

Commentary

(Section 48)

FEDERAL COURT

BETWEEN:

Glen P. Robbins

Plaintiff:

And

Her Majesty the Queen

STATEMENT OF CLAIM

(FORM 171 A)

TO THE DEFENDANT:

A LEGAL PROCEEDING HAS BEEN COMMENCED AGAINST YOU by the Plaintiff. The claim made against you is set out in the following pages.

IF YOU WISH TO DEFEND THIS PROCEEDING, you or a solicitor acting for you are required to prepare a statement of defence in Form 171B prescribed by the Federal Court Rules, 1998, serve it on the Plaintiff’s solicitor or, where the plaintiff does not have a solicitor, serve it on the plaintiff, and file it, with proof of service, at a local office of this Court, WITHIN 30 DAYS after this statement of claim is served on you if you are served within Canada.

If you are served in the United States of America, the period for serving and filing your statement of defence is forty days. If you are served outside Canada and the United States of America, the period for serving and filing your statement of defence is sixty days.

Copies of the Federal Court Rules, 1998, information concerning the local offices of the Court and other necessary information may be obtained on request to the Administrator of the Court at Ottawa (telephone 613-992-4283) or at any local office.

IF YOU FAIL TO DEFEND THIS PROCEEDING, judgment may be given against you in your absence and without further notice to you.

February 13 , 2009 Vancouver Registry 3rd floor, 701 W. Georgia Street, Vancouver, B.C.

To: Her Majesty the Queen, c/o The Federal Court of Canada and The Attorney General of Canada, 3rd floor, 701 W. Georgia Street, Vancouver, B.C.

CLAIM

1. The plaintiff claims that beginning in 1997 and continuing on until now, the defendant through its agent, Canada Customs and Revenue Agency (“CRA”) and it’s predecessor Revenue Canada (“the agents”), has carried on, and continues to carry on, a protracted, malicious and willful harassment, intimidation, and “bad faith” against the plaintiff with respect to continued and longstanding arbitrary and erroneous assessments and claiming monies owed by the plaintiff to the agent/defendant, arbitrary and erroneous re-assessments of the plaintiff to the agent/defendant, arbitrary and erroneous calculations submitted as “evidence”, which resulting in numerous misrepresentations of amounts owing and demands for monies from the plaintiff, and arbitrary and erroneous audits of the plaintiffs personal and/or business accounts by the agent/defendant, including but not limited to arbitrary and erroneous assessments, harassment of the plaintiff and his family.

2. The plaintiff claims that the “protracted, malicious, and willful harassment, Intimidation, and “bad faith” referred to in paragraph 1 has caused him significant emotional, economic, and other personal harm, and damaged his ability to properly function as a businessperson, or in the alternative to seek out meaningful employment as a consequence.

3. The plaintiff alleges that in 1997, the Defendant’s agent “CRA” made a re-assessment pursuant to an audit conducted on his company Calvary Publishing Corporation, a company solely owned by the plaintiff. The plaintiff asserts as fact, that the Defendant’ agent CRA assessed his company for GST unpaid of $80,000 which amount was later reduced to zero.

3. The plaintiff alleges that in 1997, the Defendant’s agent “CRA” made a re-assessment pursuant to an audit conducted on his company Calvary Publishing Corporation, a company solely owned by the plaintiff. The plaintiff asserts as fact, that the Defendant’ agent CRA assessed his company for GST unpaid of $80,000 which amount was later reduced to zero.

4. The plaintiff alleges that in 1998, the Defendant’s agent “CRA” made a re-assessment related to employee source deductions of his company Calvary Publishing Corp., resulting in a reassessment of the source deductions submitted by the plaintiff’s company and a demand for an additional $50,000, which amount on Appeal was later reduced to zero.

5. In 1998 the plaintiff alleges that the Defendant’s agent “CRA” reassessed a capital gain from a 1989 personal income tax return, alleging personal income taxes owing in the amount of less than $2,000. The plaintiff alleges that this erroneous and unfair reassessment conducted without proper notice to the plaintiff, and a resulting forfeiture of his rights to Appeal, has resulted in a current amount owing of $27,000 constituted primarily of interest and penalties, which the plaintiff asserts is unfair.

6. The plaintiff asserts that with respect to paragraph number 5 herein, he made every possible attempt to deal with the matter of interest and penalties, including but not limited to contacting the department within the Defendant’s agent “CRA” called “fairness” who told the plaintiff that the matter of interest and penalties could not be considered until the underlying principal amount were paid, which the plaintiff asserts was not owing in the first place, and if it were, the debt was not lawfully obtained by the Defendant’s agent “CRA” owing to the lack of procedural fairness including but not limited to the fact that the plaintiff was unable to Appeal the initial reassessment-which notification had apparently been erroneously mailed to a shopping mall and not delivered to the plaintiff’s address, which the Defendant “CRA” knew well.

7. With respect to paragraphs’ 5 and 6 herein, the plaintiff alleges that notwithstanding the circumstances surrounding how the debt was obtained, or fairness relating to interest and penalties, the Defendant “CRA” chose to ignore a British Columbia statute relating to debt limitations which sets out that no debt is due and payable after a six year time limitation.

8. With respect to paragraph 7 herein, the plaintiff claims that the Defendant “CRA” has wielded this “27,000” alleged debt, which the plaintiff denies owing as a perpetual hammer against the plaintiff including but not limited to sending erroneous notices of the debt to the plaintiff, or to others associated with the plaintiff including business partners and others, which the plaintiff asserts has hurt, or in the alternative ought to have been expected to hurt the plaintiff’s ability to credibly conduct business and other personal matters.

9. The plaintiff asserts that beginning in 2005 and continuing on to present day, the Defendant’s agent CRA initiated a series of four arbitrary and erroneous reassessments of personal income taxes of the plaintiff which were legally statute barred.

10. The plaintiff asserts that beginning in 2005 and continuing on to present day, the Defendant “CRA” has initiated a series of not less then four arbitrary and erroneous reassessments of income tax years 2000 and 2001, including an assessment of the plaintiff’s wife in the amount of $150,000 later reduced to zero, and similarly in the amount of $150,000 against the plaintiff which has been reduced to represent principal taxes owing of approximately $10,000 (Canadian), which reassessments, the plaintiff asserts are entirely and unequivocally without merit and foundation, which the plaintiff asserts he has proved in his letter to the Defendant’s agent “CRA” in his letter to them dated July 12, 2007. The plaintiff also asserts that his daughter Kellie has also been the object of unwarranted intimidation by the Defendant “CRA” including but not limited to arbitrary and erroneous reassessments which have included a reassessment overturned on Appeal and another reassessment following that successful Appeal for $280 provided without summary and the plaintiff claims is without merit.

11. With respect to paragraph 9 the plaintiff asserts that he has been provided with “mountains” of paperwork from the Defendant’s agent “CRA” with respect to the reassessment of his 2000 and 2001 personal income taxes, but seldom receives accompanying ’paperwork’ relating to his $47,000 (Canadian) non-capital losses for those two years, nor regarding his Appeal of an additional $50,000 non-capital loss relating to an unpaid loan from a third party which is the matter of a BC Supreme court filing by the plaintiff.

12. The plaintiff alleges that that Government of Canada and specifically Prime Minister Stephen Harper promised a Tax Ombudsman to deal with grievances of taxpayers but has failed to properly deliver on that promise. The plaintiff further alleges that he has asked various Revenue Ministers, and the Taxpayer Ombudsman (Canada) Office to become involved but they have not “because of a lack of funding”.

13. The plaintiff alleges that the Defendant’s agent “CRA” and specifically Burnaby-Surrey Court of Appeal personnel informed him in October 2008 that the federal ministers office had asked another office to intercede and look at the 2000 and 2001 taxation years of the plaintiff and render an opinion. The plaintiff alleges that an Officer with the Vancouver office of Appeals initially contacted the plaintiff without identifying herself and then refused to properly deal with the Appeal of a February 2008 reassessment.

14. The plaintiff alleges that the Defendant’s agent The Attorney General of Canada has taken steps to collect on an alleged student loan debt, and has attempted to proceed on debt collection on an unmerited basis, including but not limited to directing the agent of The Attorney General of Canada to direct its solicitors specifically (TBA)of Vancouver to file Orders represented as being from the B.C. Supreme Court, which Orders were never obtained, and as such the plaintiff claims against the Defendant’s agent The Attorney General of Canada for fraud, and “bad faith”. The plaintiff asserts that his complaints relating to this matter have been provided to the Registrar of the Vancouver law courts, and the B.C. Supreme Court Chief Justice, the Attorney General of BC and the Canadian Press.

15. The plaintiff alleges that he has attempted to proceed In Person against the Defendant on two occasions but was unable to complete as a consequence of the Defendant’s agent CRA’s continued and obsessive submissions of new reassessments which the plaintiff alleges exist in part to frustrate his ability to obtain equal access to justice without the services of an attorney which the plaintiff cannot afford.

Relief Sought

a. With respect to paragraph number 5 an Order that the (approximately $27,000) alleged to be owing, be reduced to zero and that this Honourable Court Order the Defendant’s agent “CRA” to cease and desist contacting anyone related to the plaintiff further for a period of not less then 10 years without a signed declaration from the Privy council of Canada.

b. With respect to the personal taxation years of the plaintiff, specifically 2000 and 2001, an Order that any amounts owing be properly reduced to zero and that non-capital losses currently enjoyed by the plaintiff be increased by an additional $50,000 to $97,000 in total.

c. An Order that from this point forward any and all tax audits, reassessments or other of the plaintiff or his immediately family be banned, save for any instance approved by The Privy Council of Canada.

d. Payment of damages in the amount of $450,000 for personal and professional damage to the plaintiff and his family as well as $1,000,000 in extraordinary and special damages as a consequence of “bad faith”.

Counsel for the plaintiff:

Counsel for the plaintiff:

(In Person) Glen P. Robbins, 1355 Honeysuckle Lane, Coquitlam, B.C., V3E 2N6

R.S. 1985, C F-7, Sch; 2002, C.8, 558