Robbins SCE Research
Home| British Columbia Polls| Canada Polls| US & the World Polls| Contact| Register| Search| Donate
A letter to Ms. Suaad Hagi Mohamud from Glen P. Robbins
  Aug 24, 2009

Commentary
I apologize on behalf of my government for your dreadful experience; it must have been terrifying for you.
I would like to comment on positions reportedly taken by you relating to your alleged improper detention in Kenya as a Canadian citizen. I believe my own experience will refute both.
The first position I rebut is that “race was a factor” in your (sic) alleged mistreatment by Canadian officials. The second is that “You don’t care about money-I’m only going to court so this never happens to another Canadian citizen.”
Ms. Mohamud, I am a Caucasian male of middle-age. My family history in Canada goes back to before Confederation. My father and his brother were in the Canadian navy fighting Germany in the Second World War. Between my mother and father’s direct families 24 children were born though some died later. I have four sisters and two brothers. I was raised in Victoria, British Columbia and moved to Vancouver at the age of 20.
In 1997 the daughter (and a few relatives and friends of similar age) of a disgraced ex business associate filed sexual harassment complaints against me for allegedly “staring”—that’s it “staring”. A part time manager who was in his late sixties at the time was also accused, until it was discovered by the now defunct B.C. Human Rights Commission then overseen by Commissioner Mary Woo Sims, a serious lesbian woman--that this man alleged to be staring--WAS LEGALLY BLIND.
These young women--now in their early thirties led by an articled student Tonie Beharell (soon afterward made a Judge), and another lawyer Lyndsay Lyster both working for well known human rights law firm, Heenan Blaikie—assisted in the conspicuous alteration of testimony from beginning to end. No opportunity was reasonably provided in the process to expose this fraud.
Next, my right to a fair hearing and to confront my accusers was taken from me when my lawyer was mysteriously disbarred by the same ministry, the BC Attorney General that was prosecuting the claims in the first place. My lawyer had applied to have each of the girls tried separately so that they could not know what final changes were made to their stories-written it would seem in large measure by their lawyers. I have publicly claimed that these two lawyers suborned perjury and have yet to be asked to retract the statement. My lawyer was certain he would win this Order as there was no history ever in the entire history of mankind and Rule of Law even remotely similar to five girls among 20 co-workers of both sexes—who were sexually harassed for 18 months “each and every day” and yet no witnesses show up to collaborate their claims. (My personal opinion is many people who work in these institutions must be completely high on drugs—or require psychological help—but I don’t have total proof of this—it is just a personal opinion).
My glee at the prospect of stopping these female liars in their dishonest tracks was short-lived when I was told that my lawyer was suddenly disbarred just months before the Trial.
The total documents involved in this case were not returned to me. No documents, no lawyer, and no time. Unfamiliar with this process, I filed documents in the B.C. Supreme Court, and served it on the Human Rights Tribunal.
Despite records I have in my possession clearly proving the Judge in this matter knew of the aforementioned lawsuit against the Tribunal—clearly establishing that I had no lawyer—AND the fact that this Judge admitted to being ill, and one girl complainant (who never testified) was also ill—had an opportunity to go forward in two and one half months—an adjournment over the summer until I could retain new legal counsel—the same trial went ahead without any defense. (I had never met one single person related to this process EVER-why validate it unprepared)?
Ms. Mohamud, by the time this crazy human rights circus was completed, one of the girls (the daughter of the ex business associate), referred to me without any evidence to collaborate—as a “pedophile”. Ms. Mohamud—pedophiles are the most reviled group of people in society. The average age of these girls was around 21 or 22—I was in my late thirties at the time. Ms. Mohamud I have no criminal record, nor have I ever been accused of any activity remotely related to that one.
Later in his reasons, the ‘kooky’ Judge referred to using my workplace “as a sexual playground”, and hooked this language in conjunction to also referring to me as “a pedophile”. My associates documented that for one full year, whenever my name Glen Robbins or Glen P. Robbins was typed onto Google Search Engine these libelous words linked to my name would be at the top of page 1 Worldwide. It took both levels of government over three years to put Meta tags on this to ensure I was not continued to be harassed by others because of the Judge’s inappropriate malicious commentary.
I filed a new 100 page Statement of Claim and served it on the government, my MLA, and a judicial body in place at the time. No defense was ever filed now some eight years later. Not long afterward the B.C. Human Rights Commission was dissolved.
Despite promises from my MLA at the time, Christy Clark, she ended up being just another politician full of baloney and never did anything about it.
I have tried many times with different governments at both levels—but not a peep. I sent the legal documents I had filed to my MP James Moore—who never bothered to get in touch. All I have asked—is to take the offensive case off the BCHRT site, issue a public apology and make financial restitution. Ms. Mohamud, when this government assault began on me I was an independent newspaper publisher producing well over $2,000,000 in annual revenues. You can readily guess how much damage something like this has put upon my immediate family—my wife and two daughters.
Since this ordeal, I have produced arguably the most influential independent public opinion polling site in the world (www.robbinssceresearch.com). In fact our polling firm was the first to document the rise of U.S. President Barack Obama, as far back as January 2008. (Our data is not influenced by colour).
Doing so under great duress and daily pressure I soon discovered that government could care less about its mistakes that happen against individuals unless it’s of political advantage to do so. How would they reconcile all of the lies and deceit from the girls, the institution run by a person of bias sexual orientation who invoked a policy that stipulated “women do not sexual harass men”, and perjured women lawyers—all women with the ruin of a middle age white man. This is Canada—successful people ought never to be victims—only women—that was my experience. Also, the Virck murders in Victoria—where young women murdered another young woman were causing psychologists and government public affairs all types of anguish—as the truth about the true potential nature of some women was coming out.
Now here I was with a case that made at least 10 of them certain liars or perjurers—easily proven.
I can tell you now from personal experience and other anecdotal knowledge that government screws up all of the time, and does so nearly just as often as they take holidays or extra long weekends. None of us are alone in complaining about incompetent expensive government.
So you can see Ms. Mohamud that if a White Canadian male with a lifetime and longtime of history in Canada can be this screwed over through such ignorance, incompetence, and ideological meanness than you’re claim of racism is likely unfounded.
My theory is supported by legal precedent.
Now—about your statement about “(going) to court so this never happens to another Canadian citizen---despite my empathy for your apparent troubles I feel this statement is a little self righteous. What don’t you want to happen again? OR do you not want this to happen to people other than White’s?
Canadian civil rights lawyers in Canada don’t like middle age While males. Moreover, our government treats it’s own—not just immigrants like shit—if and when it chooses, and than suck holes for International affection—“we’re so nice”.
In fact, Ms Mohamud, I might suggest that it is precisely because of you-a-re race that you have lawyers and are receiving media attention, and will undoubtedly receive a fair trial (a trial at all), or more likely an early settlement. This is not possible for middle age White Males—Canada’s emerging underclass.
http://www.robbinssceresearch.com/polls/poll_563.html
http://www.robbinssceresearch.com/polls/poll_569.html
http://www.robbinssceresearch.com/polls/poll_568.html
http://www.robbinssceresearch.com/polls/poll_521.html
http://www.robbinssceresearch.com/polls/poll_513.html
http://www.robbinssceresearch.com/polls/poll_506.html
http://www.robbinssceresearch.com/polls/poll_447.html
http://www.robbinssceresearch.com/polls/poll_432.html
http://www.robbinssceresearch.com/polls/poll_371.html
http://www.robbinssceresearch.com/polls/poll_329.html
http://www.robbinssceresearch.com/polls/poll_181.html
http://www.robbinssceresearch.com/polls/poll_461.html

Home| British Columbia Polls| Canada Polls| US and the World Polls| Contact| Register| Search| Site Map
Copyright Robbins SCE Research Inc. ©2010