Robbins SCE Research
Home| British Columbia Polls| Canada Polls| US & the World Polls| Contact| Register| Search| Donate
Letter from Glen Robbins to Law Society of BC - Department of Justice Canada - BC AG - synopsis of conspiracy among BC lawyers, BC Law Society - BC Justices
  Dec 20, 2014

Law Society of British Columbia Supreme Court of Canada 845 Cambie Street, Vancouver, B.C. Attention: Benchers & Board of Governors cc BC Attorney General-S. Anton Department of Justice Canada Canadian Judicial Council
Attention: Board of Governors, Benchers Law Society of British Columbia
Re: Request for letters lost in home invasion June 14, 2014 @ 1355 Honeysuckle Lane
I have served the Law Society of British Columbia with applications for leave to appeal submissions to the Supreme Court of Canada from myself and other members of my family 'tribe' dated September, 2015 and April 2015. Submissions from the latter date have been re submitted at the direction of the Supreme Court of Canada. Please note that a BC Supreme Court decision in Law Society of BC v Parsons (BCSC 2151214) dated July 8, 2015 at para 2. stipulates the Order of Madame Justice Fisher which stipulates that “This Order does not prevent Mr. Parsons from: appearing in court,...or assisting others to prepare documents for court,,,provided that any such assistance is done without the expectation of any fee or reward.”
The primary Order given by Fisher J. at para 1 involves subsection 15(5) of the LPA the commence, defend, prosecute prohibition which Grauer J in Law Society of BC v Glen P. Robbins designated in his Reasons to be clearly delineated to the actions of a solicitor in filing documents at court registry and unrelated to the Constitutional discretion of justices to hear from a person not a party to an action on behalf of others, providing “they were not in expectation of a fee or reward.”
The Order of Fisher J in the Parsons is similar to the Grauer J. case where Grauer J stipulates in his Reasons for Judgment at Page 3 para (6) “Mr. Robbins asserts (sic) that he has not been practicing law because he not been charging a fee, and simply stands in the shoes of his family members (aka “the Tribe”). Accordingly, the Law Society of B.C. should leave him alone. It is for the court to decided its discretion whether it will grant him an audience.”
At para (7) Grauer J. adds “That the court has such discretion, quite apart from anything in the Legal Profession Act, is not in doubt.”
The Grauer J. Reasons for Judgment leads to an Order under subsection 15(5) of the LPA against Glen P. Robbins relating to commencing, defending and prosecuting claims for which arguments and submissions have been well made in the aforementioned April – September 2015 submissions to the Supreme Court of Canada – where the chasm between the solicitors act of filing court documents pursuant to the limitations of subsection 15 (5) and the role of the solicitor to that level of court overseen by the provincial administration ends...and the discretion of the Constitutionally appointed justice begins during Court proceedings.
The Reasons and Orders of Mister Justice Grauer made October 3, 2011 in Law Society v Glen P. Robbins (BCSC S111171) and Madame Justice Fisher made May 2015 ( BCSC 2151214) are consistent with one another and form precedent (stare decisis). This precedent in interpretation of subsection 15 (5) clearly refutes the dishonest submissions made by Ronald Bakonyi (Cambridge Mortgage Investment Corporation) and Robert Ellis (BMO Bank of Montreal) made to Madame Justice Fenlon on May 9th, 2013) during foreclosure hearings.
These purposefully dishonest submissions and the ORDER MADE AFTER APPLICATION signed by Bakonyi and Ellis in relation to this Order in relation to the May 9th, 2013 foreclosure hearing filed May 31, 2013 under BCSC H130330 falsely declares that Justice Fenlon made order that Grauer J.'s order of October 3, 2011 interpreted and applied to the May 9th, 2013 foreclosure stipulated that “Glen Robbins had no standing and (sic) was prohibited from speaking on behalf of Ita Robbins and Frana Matich in this matter”.
First of all as submissions to SCC to date indicate no Application was ever made and no evidence was provided to prove that Glen Robbins had no standing and no order was made by Justice Fenlon that Glen Robbins was prohibited from speaking on behalf of Ita Robbins or Frana Matich. Obviously, a provincial statute made by the Government of BC cannot cross over into the area of judicial discretion under the Constitution.
It is clear that the ORDER MADE AFTER APPLICATION signed in the name of Justice Lauri Ann Fenlon (now at BC Court of Appeal) and signed by Ronald Bakonyi and Robert Ellis, your members, is a forgery.
In current submissions being developed to the SCC to operate in conjunction with the April and September 2015 (the “Robbins Trilogy”) I intend to make the case that not only was this corrupt and criminal order a forgery but also that Justice Fenlon was a passive participant in the outcome on the basis of unlawful conduct conspiracy. Justice Fenlon cleverly said enough to defend herself such as declaring that the respondents Ita Robbins and Frana Matich “had a case” or that she would normally hear from non lawyers on behalf of others in certain circumstances, but that she could not hear from Glen Robbins in this particular case (H130330) because of the Grauer J order.
To be blunt, I believe I will prove that Fenlon J. purposefully and with malice aforethought misinterpreted the Grauer J. order knowing full well it that subsection 15 (5) had no connection to speaking on behalf of anyone under discretion of the Constitutionally appointed justice. Justice Fenlon was exhorted under Transcript Evidence of May 9th, 2013 by Glen Robbins to read the Reasons of Justice Grauer made October 3, 2011 during the long lunch recess. The Reasons are 14 pages and double spaced. Justice Fenlon would have been properly edified of the nature of her discretion by the top of Page 3 (as cited herein).
The fact that Fenlon J was unaware of her discretion in this particular case given her recital of her awareness of it throughout the dicta (which you all possess) is not the least bit plausible.
This forgery order Made by Mr. Bakonyi and Mr. Ellis on May 9th, 2013 and filed at Vancouver courthouse under file No.: H130330 May 31st, 2013 (and not served for some time later to escape scrutiny of the appeal required under the BCCA Rules within a 30 day period) was later employed in filing for Conduct of Sale application made and Order received from Master Tokarek of December 9th, 2013. I attended to that hearing December 9th, 2013 in an effort to argue jurisdiction deficiency and reassert the unconscionable loan and fraudulent mortgage registration of Cambridge Mortgage Investment Corporation (and sister company Peet and Cowan Financial Services).
One week ago December 7th, 2015 I attended a pre scheduled appointment with BC Court Services desk 210 to listen to tapes relating to the December 9th, 2013 matter before Master Tokarek, the matter of April 7, 2014 before Justice Kloegman and March 21, 2014 Trial before Chief Justice Hinkson. Instead the court records notes for each of those hearing was transcribes for affidavit purposes in this upcoming 3rd application to the SCC under the “Robbins Trilogy”. ( I would note that the notes from Kloegman J. indicate her intention to place a Stay of Proceedings on the April 7, 2014 application of Bakonyi and Cambridge Mortgage to April 30, 2014).
In the December 9th, 2013 hearing before Master Tokarek clearly indicated on court record that “his hands were tied” in terms of hearing Glen Robbins because of the ORDER MADE AFTER APPLICATION of May 9th, 2013 of Madame Justice Fenlon prohibiting Glen Robbins from speaking on behalf of Ita Robbins and Frana Matich (the forged order).
Later at (ex parte) hearing relating to the appeal of the Tokarek order made December 9th, 2013 and hearing of application for Glen Robbins to be added as party (April 23rd and 24th, 2014) before Justices Davies and Smith the forged Order is referenced.
In later BC Court of Appeal applications made by Bakonyi for Cambridge he presents Reasons evidence from the December 9th, 2013 before Master Tokarek as no one appearing on behalf of Ita Robbins and Frana Matich (from H130330) when the notes obtained from desk 210 on December 7, 2015 clearly note that Glen Robbins was in attendance. Bakonyi is misrepresenting the facts and truth depending on where he is making an application depending on what might suit him best. He makes certain the forged order of May 9th, 2013 is not submitted to BC Court of Appeal, only to the lower court.
Clearly this extends the time period of the forged order through a number of courts and many justices and judges (including the SCC 35772) by Bakonyi for at least a year and one half or longer. Did his client really instruct him to do this?
We are currently preparing evidence of our allegations made with respect to this forged Order made May 9th, 2013 and filed May 31, 2013 to the SCC as part of the overall “Robbins Trilogy” inclusive of the April and September 2015 application submissions (which include the forged order, Grauer J. Reasons and Transcript Evidence) as part of an unlawful conduct conspiracy case we intend to make against Ronald Bakonyi member Law Society of B.C. for Cambridge Mortgage Investment Corporation (and Peet and Cowan Financial Services under BCSC 149328), Robert Ellis for BMO Bank of Montreal (who I believe was playing Fagin to Bakonyi's Artful Dodger).
We will also include submissions connecting the Law Society of BC to Chief Justice Hinkson in relation to the matter of Trial of S111171 and Application for Vexatious Proceedings. This Trial proceeded by way of Application under section 18 of the Supreme Court Act (BC) from a file which was commenced by way of Petition under mandate of the Law Society of BC and Legal Profession Act specifically subsection 15(5) clearly different subject matter than the section 18 action brought within it.
I believe this hasty trial was a colluded effort between the Law Society of BC and Christopher Hinkson CJ well known to it in his former capacity as lawyer to legal members in trouble with the LSBC. Christopher Hinkson was lawyer to John Motiuk Glen Robbins lawyer at BCHRT matters and I believe and will stipulate in upcoming affidavit the belief that it was Christopher Hinkson who instructed John Motiuk not to inform me that he had been decertified and disbarred which ultimately caused me to have my application to sever the 5 complainants in that matter and later to lose the case which caused my name to referenced as a pedophile under Google for over three years.
The actions of the LSBC and Chief Justice Hinkson alleged are important on the basis of my theory under the unlawful conduct conspiracy arguments that Hinkson CJ knew his responsibility in the Motiuk BCHRT matter and also knew that I filed suit and the Government of British Columbia had not filed a Statement of Defence in the pedophile matter and other allegations. This lawsuit remains open for a filing of Order for Damages on the basis of no statement of defence.
By making Christopher Hinkson Chief Justice November 2013 he was now in a position to help cover up his complicity in the matter involving his client disbarred lawyer John Motiuk by permitted an abuse of process and application by Law Society of BC lawyer Michael Kleisinger under the Grauer docket (S111171).
I would ask that the Law Society of BC Executive and Board of Governors provide me copies of any and all correspondence sent by it to me Glen P. Robbins between the dates of June 2013 and March 2014 to the address provided herein. Please note that this letter will be advanced to the Supreme Court of Canada, the Attorney General of BC, the Minister of Justice Canada, the Canadian Judicial Council and others. I would like all letters ONLY – by December 22, 2015 in order to include them in the submissions relating to the 3rd part of the “Robbins Trilogy”.
I would ask that you send the letters by Express Post and have none of the 'terrorists' you see fit to employ as process servers on property.
Sincerely, Glen P. Robbins

Home| British Columbia Polls| Canada Polls| US and the World Polls| Contact| Register| Search| Site Map
Copyright Robbins SCE Research Inc. ©2021